The Higher Power of Lucky

intellectual freedom No Comments

Early today I finished reading Susan Patron's The Higher Power of Lucky (Atheneum Books for Young Readers, 2006), Newbery Award winner and the center of a silly controversy–so silly and so well known that I won't rehash it here. Lucky is a 10-year-old girl who shows curiosity, imagination, grit, pluck, vulnerability, and love. Her life in Hard Pan, population 43, in the California desert may seem small compared to the life of an urban child her age, but Lucky doesn't see it that way. In a town with a Cannery Row sort of cast of characters Lucky appreciates each one's quirks while oblivious to her own. She always, but always carries her survival backpack. This would seem odd if she had not lost her mother two years earlier when her mother stepped on a downed power line and was electrocuted and if her father's only contact with her since her birth has been through paltry monthly support checks. She has good reason to feel threatened by the world.

Suffice it to say that this subtly plotted book whose characters win our sympathy is indeed worthy of the Newbery. After reading it one thinks only of them, not of a word that some–many of whom have probably not read the book–have erroneously made the book's focal point. I recommend you read it. You can't help but enjoy it.


Protecting children

intellectual freedom No Comments

Wednesday afternoon in Westwood Village near the UCLA campus I picked up a copy of The Onion, that delightful satirical newspaper founded in Madison, Wisconsin nearly twenty years ago. A headline on the front page grabbed my attention: “Child-Safety Experts Call For Restrictions On Childhood Imagination.”

I immediately connected this to the scorched earth legislative proposals intended to protect children from Internet predators by radically restricting youngsters' access to social networking Web sites. Stifling creative young imaginations isn't the intent of these laws, but that would be their collateral damage to kids. This tongue-in-cheek Onion article advises parents to educate their children about the hazards of exercising their young imaginations. So, like the best satire, it offers a kernel of truth. The danger is not in the childrens' imaginations but in the twisted misrepresentations of online predators. And that is something parents should educate their children about.

And speaking of protecting children from their imaginations–nothing can stimulate anyone's imagination, regardless of age, as much as a good book. Maybe that is the real motive behind the controversy about Susan Patron's Newbery Award-winning book, The Higher Power of Lucky. Perhaps concern expressed about the presence of the word “scrotum” in the book is merely a fig leaf covering its critics' true concern. If they can keep the book out of kids' hands, the book cannot stimulate kids' imaginations. So, if the kids hear about the controversy, that will stimulate their imaginations and curiosity about “that word,” a word that to Lucky, the book's young main character, sounds “like something green that comes up when you have the flu and cough too much.” Wouldn't it be fascinating to find out what it sounds like to kids who don't have the opportunity to enjoy the book? Lucky herself “could never ask about the story of Roy, since she had overheard it. If she asked about Roy, then he [Short Sammy] would know she had been eavesdropping at the anonymous twelve-step meetings” alcoholics, gamblers, overeaters, and smokers held on different days on the patio of the Found Object and Wind Chime Museum and Visitor Center in Hard Pan, California. Surely some kids have overheard adults discussing the controversy and heard “that word” said in a way that has inspired them to come up with their own ideas about what it means. But were they to ask what the word means, they would out themselves as eavesdroppers.

Hard Pan's Found Object and Wind Chime Museum and Visitor Center, mentioned in the book's second sentence, should be enough to stimulate any reader's imagination and make him/her eager to read on. Of course, then the reader will encounter “that word” in the second paragraph and would want to read on to find out how Roy, Short Sammy's dog, fared after being bitten by a snake. (Roy vanquishes the attacker and Short Sammy's wife gets him to the vet in time to save him.) The Onion may be on to something–maybe childhood imagination can be dangerous!

I have read only the first chapter of The Higher Power of Lucky and am looking forward to getting to know Lucky, the colorful characters of Hard Pan, why Lucky has a French guardian named Brigette, and more.

Naive proposed legislation

intellectual freedom No Comments

American Libraries Online reported on Wednesday, February 21:

Legislators in Illinois, Georgia, and North Carolina have drafted bills that would restrict access by children and teens to such websites as MySpace and Facebook, while the U.S. Senate is again considering a law that jeopardizes e-rate funding for libraries that do not limit minors’ use of social networking sites.

Please read the full AL report for information about the proposed laws' similarities and differences. All have in common a narrow understanding of the range and uses of social networking Websites. All focus on the exceptions (i.e., predatory child molesters), not the norm for how these networks are used in practice. All offer concerned parents and others false assurance that they will protect their children.

School teachers and librarians do not support child molestation. We do support access to information for adults and children. We also support parents' prerogatives to decide which television shows, music, Web sites, books, etc., they think their children should experience and which they should not experience. I am very conservative on this issue. I believe parents, not ham-handed laws that throw the baby out with the bath, should make these decisions for their children and for their children only. That is how my wife and I raised our children.

But, but! some will say–what about the times that a parent can't be looking over their child's shoulder to make sure that they aren't viewing a verboten Web site? Surveillance works when it is possible to sustain it, but it misses an opportunity every parent ought to embrace. That is the opportunity to educate their children about the risk that some they meet in chat rooms or other interactive Web venues will be spoofing their age and interests and that, because these individuals could hurt them, their children should avoid them. They also need to be taught what personal information they can share and what information they should bever share. Such education will serve their children well as they explore the electronic realm independently. Parents have a responsibility here that they should not abdicate by outsourcing that responsibility to bad legislation that will deprive their children of legitimate online learning and entertainment opportunities. For some years now we have heard how important it is to free enterprise and a strong economy to keep government out of business. Yet some laissez-faire advocates are willing to force government to intrude on the parent-child relationship.

It is unfortunate that as long as politicians think they can make political hay by painting one-sided views of the Internet, they will probably keep introducing legislation that in the name of safety throttles families' options and usurps their responsibilities. Children get hurt on playgrounds. They get hurt in competitive sports. We can keep them safe by closing all playgrounds and suspending all athletic competitions. But they would lose so much in their lives. No politician would propose these extreme measures to keep children safe. Nor should they be proposing the extreme measures in these proposed laws.

From reject to 1 of only 10 at ACRL Baltimore!

reference service No Comments

Back in September I reported on the fate of the program proposal I sbmitted for the 2007 ACRL National Conference. In August I received notice that the proposal had not been accepted. Then a month later I received notice inviting us to present our program–this because an accepted program had to drop out for some reason. Bill Miller, Jerry Campbell, Cheryl Laguardia, Brian Mathews, and I will present our program, The Reference Question: Where has reference been? Where is reference going? 8:30-9:30 Friday morning, March 30 the Baltimore Convention Center, room 318-323, a very ample room.

This past Friday I received another e-mail from ACRL staff. This one informed me that “The Baltimore Virtual Conference subcommittee thinks your program will have wide appeal and has selected your program as one of the ten they would like to offer as a live webcast. I'm writing to you today to invite you to reoffer your face-to-face presentation, The Reference Question–Where has Reference Been? Where is Reference Going?, as an online webcast.” Not bad to go from rejection to one of only 10!

We will reprise the f2f program as a webcast 1:00-2:00 Friday afternoon, March 30. We are delighted that we will be able to offer this to a wider audience–including on-site conference attendees who don't get to take in the morning presentation. It would be nice if some in Baltimore need to take in the webcast because they couldn't get into a packed room at 8:30 in the morning!

$21,280 starting salary in a Virginia public library system

library workers' compensation No Comments

The February 2, 2007 edition of the Newport News (VA) Daily Press includes an article reporting that librarians working for the Blackwater Regional Library System receive a starting salary of $21,280. The system will conduct a study comparing its salaries to those of other area public libraries.

My letter to the editor on this topic follows:

The bad news is the $21,280 starting salary for librarians in Isle of Wight and Surry counties. The good news is that the
Daily Press has brought attention to this sorry state of affairs.

There is really no need for a study. The study will, however, provide quantitative evidence to support the self-evident–that $21,280 is a paltry starting salary for a professional with a master's degree (who may be carrying sizeable student debt incurred while earning that degree). A study of salaries in other libraries in the region won't, however, tell the whole story.

The market for librarians, like the market for other professionals, is national. The 2006 salary study for librarians compiled by the Allied Professional Association, an affiliate of the American Library Association, shows that in public and college libraries the average salary was $56,259 and the mean was $50,976. In January APA's governing Council approved a resolution endorsing “a minimum salary for professional librarians of not less than $40,000 per year.”

The question isn't whether or not the Blackwater Regional Library's starting salary for professionals should be raised. The question is how quickly it can nearly double.


I'll let you know if the paper publishes my letter.

Listening to ALA members in Seattle

American Library Association No Comments

Fictional Seattle radio call-in psychiatrist Frazier Crane greeted his audience with “I'm listening, Seattle.” In Seattle during the recent ALA Midwinter Meeting I listened, not to questions about relationships gone awry or intimate secrets, but to ALA members speaking about their concerns about ALA and librarianship along with their hopes and aspirations for the association and our field. What did I hear while making the rounds of ALA groups campaigning for president?

ALTA's exciting idea

When I met with the board of ALTA (the Association of Library Trustees and Advocates) I heard about their plan to offer ALTA membership at a special price to entire library boards. What an innovative way to show more trustees the value of ALTA and ALA! I assured them that this is something I will talk about as ALA president so that more library boards will take advantage of this great opportunity.

Sometimes feeling overlooked

In my meetings with some of the Round Tables and some of the ethnic caucuses (AILA, APALA, BCALA, CALA, REFORMA), I heard two things: First I heard of valuable service they perform in giving their members opportunities to work with colleagues from every type of library on shared interests and passions. They have created needed organizational niches to meet their members' distinct needs. I also heard that they sometimes feel overlooked and underapreciated by ALA. As vice-president and as president I will definitely meet with the leadership of these groups and we will brainstorm about ways to make their contributions better known. In the process I imagine we will find opportunities for collaborations among some of these groups. The ethnic caucuses definitely showed the power of collaboration in their very successful Joint Conference of Librarians of Color in Dallas in October!

Hopes that the ALA Web site will indeed improve

When I was asked about the ALA Web site I was able to relate my experience as a participant in the December 18 Web retreat at ALA headquarters. The group reviewed results of a usability study of the current Web site. This was the launch pad for brainstorming about how the site should serve members and its broader audience. By the end of the day the group gave ALA staff clear direction on priorities for change. During the past year ALA has gone through an RFP process to adopt a new content management system. Conversion of the site to this new CMS will take time, as will implementation of the changes identified as priorities on December 18. ALA is listening. I will continue to listen to members and carry their concerns to ALA headquarters until we have the Web site that meets our needs.

Concern about difficulty booking hotel rooms for Midwinter and the coming Annual Conference in Washington, DC

I shared this concern with Mary Ghikas, ALA's Senior Associate Executive Director. She described coming procedural changes designed to improve the situation. She also described a phenomenon I had not heard of. In some cases when several members are going to share a room, each of them books a hotel room until they decide which booking to use. This takes rooms out of the pool for unknown lengths of time. I don't know how common this practice is. While understandable, it is problematic. As one of the many currently waitlisted for a hotel in Washington, I think that ALA needs to plan for the robust attendance we have seen at recent conferences (with the anomaly of New Orleans) and increase the pool of rooms and make all of them available at the start of registration. It is in ALA's interests to solve this problem. If members decide that it is just too hard to get lodging for a conference, they may decide not to attend. That will hurt revenues. Members who book multiple rooms for the same group of roommates should book just one. It will take trust between ALA and its members to solve this. We can create a win-win solution. If the problem persists when I am president, I will lead the Executive Board in working with staff to solve it then.


My platform

I also received a great deal of positive feedback about my platform. Thank you to all who listened to me in Seattle. I hope that after hearing me you decided that you will vote for me. Please do!